Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · 1996 · Vol. 39(10) · pp. S35–S46
Morris E. FranklinDaniel RosenthalDaniel Abrego-MedinaJames P. DormanJeffrey L. GlassRichard F. NoremA. J. Díaz

Abstract

After five years, this study shows that laparoscopy does no harm to the patient, offers comparable oncologic resections, and seems to be patient-friendly, with less pain, quicker return of bowel functions, shortened hospitalization, and quicker return to full activity.

Colorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionMedicineLaparoscopyColorectal cancerSurgerySurgical oncologyCarcinomaColorectal surgeryAbdominal surgeryLymph nodeProspective cohort study

MeSH terms

AgedCarcinomaColectomyColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLaparotomyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalLaparoscopyProspective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome
Citations
449
FWCI
13.87
field-weighted impact
References
11
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · 2001 · 418 citations
Guidelines 2000 for Colon and Rectal Cancer Surgery
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2001 · 1,292 citations
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma · Scinovex