Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Cellulose Nanocrystals vs. Cellulose Nanofibrils: A Comparative Study on Their Microstructures and Effects as Polymer Reinforcing Agents

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2013 · Vol. 5(8) · pp. 2999–3009
Xuezhu XuFei LiuLong JiangJ. Y. ZhuDarrin M. HaagensonDennis P. Wiesenborn

Abstract

Both cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) are nanoscale cellulose fibers that have shown reinforcing effects in polymer nanocomposites. CNCs and CNFs are different in shape, size and composition. This study systematically compared their morphologies, crystalline structure, dispersion properties in polyethylene oxide (PEO) matrix, interactions with matrix, and the resulting reinforcing effects on the matrix polymer. Transparent PEO/CNC and PEO/CNF nanocomposites comprising up to 10 wt % nanofibers were obtained via solution casting. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WXRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA), and tensile testing were used to examine the above-mentioned properties of nanocellulose fibers and composites. At the same nanocellulose concentration, CNFs led to higher strength and modulus than did CNCs due to CNFs' larger aspect ratio and fiber entanglement, but lower strain-at-failure because of their relatively large fiber agglomerates. The Halpin-Kardos and Ouali models were used to simulate the modulus of the composites and good agreements were found between the predicted and experimental values. This type of systematic comparative study can help to develop the criteria for selecting proper nanocellulose as a biobased nano-reinforcement material in polymer nanocomposites.

Advanced Cellulose Research StudiesPolysaccharides and Plant Cell WallsNanocomposite Films for Food PackagingMaterials scienceNanocelluloseComposite materialNanocompositePolymerNanofiberCellulosePolymer nanocompositeUltimate tensile strengthDynamic mechanical analysis

Funding

  • U.S. Forest Service
  • Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Citations
978
FWCI
19.92
field-weighted impact
References
59
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Crop residues management: A sustainable approach for rice and wheat production in Indo-Gangetic plains
International Journal of Research in Agronomy · 2024 · 5 citations
Nanocellulose in bio-based food packaging applications
Industrial Crops and Products · 2016 · 517 citations
Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing
Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing · 2015 · 696 citations
Nanocellulose based biodegradable polymers
European Polymer Journal · 2020 · 299 citations
Cellulose Nanoparticles: Structure–Morphology–Rheology Relationships
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2015 · 473 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Cellulose Nanocrystals vs. Cellulose Nanofibrils: A Comparative Study on Their Microstructures and Effects as Polymer Reinforcing Agents · Scinovex