article Open AccessTop 10% cited
Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
Astronomy and Astrophysics · 2006 · Vol. 464(1) · pp. 399–404
Abstract
Aims.The maximum-likelihood method is the standard approach to obtain model fits to observational data and the corresponding confidence regions. We investigate possible sources of bias in the log-likelihood function and its subsequent analysis, focusing on estimators of the inverse covariance matrix. Furthermore, we study under which circumstances the estimated covariance matrix is invertible.
Statistical and numerical algorithmsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceClimate variability and modelsEstimation of covariance matricesMathematicsCovariance matrixStatisticsCovarianceEstimatorLikelihood functionInvertible matrixCovariance functionApplied mathematics
Citations
840
FWCI
9.57
field-weighted impact
References
18
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2015 · 1,752 citations
The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2017 · 3,023 citations
Cosmological parameters from the BOSS galaxy power spectrum
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2020 · 409 citations
References
Weak gravitational lensing
Physics Reports · 2001 · 2,257 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
