articleTop 1% cited
Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography
Bone · 2003 · Vol. 33(4) · pp. 744–750
R. Paul Crawford✉(University of California, Berkeley)Christopher E. Cann(University of California, San Francisco)Tony M. Keaveny(University of California, Berkeley)
Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone and Joint DiseasesHip and Femur FracturesQuantitative computed tomographyFinite element methodVoxelBone mineralStiffnessCompressive strengthVertebraCompression (physics)TomographyBone density
MeSH terms
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSpineTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone DensityLinear ModelsCompressive StrengthFinite Element Analysis
Funding
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
Citations
534
FWCI
12.20
field-weighted impact
References
41
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling
Journal of Biomechanics · 1997 · 672 citations
Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals
Bone · 1987 · 488 citations
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Journal of Biomechanics · 2001 · 694 citations
The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone
Bone · 1999 · 708 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.