Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

A Consumer's Guide to Evenness Indices

Oikos · 1996 · Vol. 76(1) · pp. 70–70

Abstract

Many indices have been proposed for measuring species evenness in ecological communities, but there is no consensus on which are best. We assemble criteria for an appropriate index for the evenness of a biological sample. The most important criterion is that evenness should be independent of species richness. Twelve previously proposed indices and variants are considered, and two apparently new indices. Four indices are recommended as joint best buys: A) If symmetry between minor and abundant species is not important, or if it is required that the index be less affected by minor species: 1) If it is essential that the index be able to reach a minimum of zero with any particular number of species, or if the shape of the index response to an evenness gradient is important: E 1/D (based on a common form of Simpson's index). 2) If good mid-range behaviour is desired: E' (proposed by Camargo). B) If equal sensitivity to minor and abundant species is required: I) If the shape of the index response to an evenness gradient is not important, the clear winner is: E Q (a new index). 2) If the shape is important: E var (another new index). The overall recommendation for general use is E war .

Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesPlant and animal studiesSpecies evennessSpecies richnessIndex (typography)Diversity indexMathematicsStatisticsSpecies diversityEcologyMinor (academic)Biology
Citations
1,254
FWCI
5.39
field-weighted impact
References
24
Percentile
95%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology.
Evolution · 1970 · 3,816 citations
<i>The Mathematical Theory of Communication</i>
Physics Today · 1950 · 9,849 citations
Measurement of Diversity
Nature · 1949 · 13,763 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.