Scinovex
reviewTop 1% cited

Benzodiazepines revisited—will we ever learn?

Addiction · 2011 · Vol. 106(12) · pp. 2086–2109
Malcolm Lader

Abstract

The practical problems with the benzodiazepines have persisted for 50 years, but have been ignored by many practitioners and almost all official bodies. The risk-benefit ratio of the benzodiazepines remains positive in most patients in the short term (2-4 weeks) but is unestablished beyond that time, due mainly to the difficulty in preventing short-term use from extending indefinitely with the risk of dependence. Other research issues include the possibility of long-term brain changes and evaluating the role of the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, in aiding withdrawal.

Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderTolerabilityAdverse effectAnxietyMedicinePsychiatryMEDLINEPsychologyPharmacologyPolitical science

MeSH terms

AccidentsAge FactorsAntidotesAnxiety DisordersBenzodiazepinesCognitionEpidemiologic MethodsEuropeFemaleFlumazenilUnited KingdomHumansHypnotics and SedativesSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersMale
Citations
542
FWCI
25.24
field-weighted impact
References
274
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Benzodiazepine harm: how can it be reduced?
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2012 · 349 citations
References
The Neurocircuitry of Fear, Stress, and Anxiety Disorders
Neuropsychopharmacology · 2009 · 2,036 citations
The cochrane database of systematic reviews
Journal of Psychosomatic Research · 1996 · 6,119 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Benzodiazepines revisited—will we ever learn? · Scinovex