Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Institutions and the Resource Curse

The Economic Journal · 2006 · Vol. 116(508) · pp. 1–20
Halvor MehlumKarl Ove MoeneRagnar Torvik

Abstract

Countries rich in natural resources constitute both growth losers and growth winners. We claim that the main reason for these diverging experiences is differences in the quality of institutions. More natural resources push aggregate income down, when institutions are grabber friendly, while more resources raise income, when institutions are producer friendly. We test this theory building on Sachs and Warner's influential works on the resource curse. Our main hypothesis - that institutions are decisive for the resource curse - is confirmed. Our results contrast the claims of Sachs and Warner that institutions do not play a role. Copyright 2006 Royal Economic Society.

Natural Resources and Economic DevelopmentCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesInternational Development and AidCurseResource curseNatural resourceResource (disambiguation)EconomicsQuality (philosophy)Test (biology)Public economicsSociologyPolitical science
Citations
2,722
FWCI
112.62
field-weighted impact
References
46
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
History Lessons: Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development in the New World
The Journal of Economic Perspectives · 2000 · 1,692 citations
Problems of Industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe
The Economic Journal · 1943 · 2,528 citations
Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others?
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 1999 · 7,870 citations
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation
American Economic Review · 2001 · 8,109 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.