Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers

Scientific Reports · 2015 · Vol. 5(1) · pp. 13087–13087
Chintan ParmarPatrick GroßmannJohan BussinkPhilippe LambinHugo J.W.L. Aerts

Abstract

Radiomics extracts and mines large number of medical imaging features quantifying tumor phenotypic characteristics. Highly accurate and reliable machine-learning approaches can drive the success of radiomic applications in clinical care. In this radiomic study, fourteen feature selection methods and twelve classification methods were examined in terms of their performance and stability for predicting overall survival. A total of 440 radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 464 lung cancer patients. To ensure the unbiased evaluation of different machine-learning methods, publicly available implementations along with reported parameter configurations were used. Furthermore, we used two independent radiomic cohorts for training (n = 310 patients) and validation (n = 154 patients). We identified that Wilcoxon test based feature selection method WLCX (stability = 0.84 ± 0.05, AUC = 0.65 ± 0.02) and a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 ± 0.03) had highest prognostic performance with high stability against data perturbation. Our variability analysis indicated that the choice of classification method is the most dominant source of performance variation (34.21% of total variance). Identification of optimal machine-learning methods for radiomic applications is a crucial step towards stable and clinically relevant radiomic biomarkers, providing a non-invasive way of quantifying and monitoring tumor-phenotypic characteristics in clinical practice.

Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFerroptosis and cancer prognosisRadiomicsRandom forestFeature selectionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningWilcoxon signed-rank testStability (learning theory)Pattern recognition (psychology)Statistics

MeSH terms

Machine LearningCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLung NeoplasmsROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkers, TumorSurvival AnalysisArea Under Curve

Funding

  • National Institutes of Health
Citations
996
FWCI
48.16
field-weighted impact
References
42
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications
CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2019 · 1,785 citations
Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics
Medical Physics · 2020 · 567 citations
Applications and limitations of radiomics
Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2016 · 1,204 citations
Artificial intelligence in radiology
Nature reviews. Cancer · 2018 · 3,504 citations
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.