Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era

S. KhanS. HusaMark HannamF. OhmeM. PürrerXisco Jiménez FortezaA. Bohé

Abstract

We present a new frequency-domain phenomenological model of the gravitational-wave signal from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of nonprecessing (aligned-spin) black-hole binaries. The model is calibrated to 19 hybrid effective-one-body--numerical-relativity waveforms up to mass ratios of $1\ensuremath{\mathbin:}18$ and black-hole spins of $|a/m|\ensuremath{\sim}0.85$ (0.98 for equal-mass systems). The inspiral part of the model consists of an extension of frequency-domain post-Newtonian expressions, using higher-order terms fit to the hybrids. The merger ringdown is based on a phenomenological ansatz that has been significantly improved over previous models. The model exhibits mismatches of typically less than 1% against all 19 calibration hybrids and an additional 29 verification hybrids, which provide strong evidence that, over the calibration region, the model is sufficiently accurate for all relevant gravitational-wave astronomy applications with the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors. Beyond the calibration region the model produces physically reasonable results, although we recommend caution in assuming that any merger-ringdown waveform model is accurate outside its calibration region. As an example, we note that an alternative nonprecessing model, SEOBNRv2 (calibrated up to spins of only 0.5 for unequal-mass systems), exhibits mismatch errors of up to 10% for high spins outside its calibration region. We conclude that waveform models would benefit most from a larger number of numerical-relativity simulations of high-aligned-spin unequal-mass binaries.

Pulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGeophysics and Sensor TechnologyGravitational wavePhysicsDetectorPhenomenological modelBlack hole (networking)Domain (mathematical analysis)Gravitational-wave observatoryAstronomyAstrophysicsOptics

Funding

  • European Commission
  • Partnership for Advanced Computing in Europe AISBL
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Govern de les Illes Balears
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
Citations
1,054
FWCI
53.92
field-weighted impact
References
78
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Advanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors
Classical and Quantum Gravity · 2010 · 1,270 citations
Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform?
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · 1994 · 1,554 citations
Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · 1999 · 1,255 citations
Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with Gravitational Waves
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología · 2009 · 510 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.